Hi, For this thread, I'd prefer sticking to ideas on whether to implement the HTTP methods in the urlresolver and if the idea is any good - how this could be done. Right now the urlresolver works with strings or functions, not dictionaries. Adding dictionaries to the urlpatterns increases the complexity a bit and introduces a complete new concept & behaviour. I'd prefer a simple solution that will allow you to specify the HTTP method for a view without adding noise to the whole urlresolver. Any ideas? Met vriendelijke groet, Simon de Haan Eight Media +31 (0)26 38 42 440 On Sep 22, 2006, at 9:44 AM, limodou wrote:
|
- Re: Extend URL resolver support for HTTP Methods / REST... Malcolm Tredinnick
- Re: Extend URL resolver support for HTTP Methods /... Malcolm Tredinnick
- Re: Extend URL resolver support for HTTP Methods /... Simon de Haan
- Re: Extend URL resolver support for HTTP Methods /... Malcolm Tredinnick
- Re: Extend URL resolver support for HTTP Metho... Simon de Haan
- Re: Extend URL resolver support for HTTP M... Malcolm Tredinnick
- Re: Extend URL resolver support for HT... Ned Batchelder
- Re: Extend URL resolver support f... James Crasta
- Re: Extend URL resolver suppo... Simon de Haan
- Re: Extend URL resolver suppo... Russell Cloran
- Re: Extend URL resolver support f... wes
- Re: Extend URL resolver suppo... James Crasta
