On Feb 2, 1:17 pm, "Frankie Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I had some trouble understanding your situation. So I'm not > sure, but isn't this what prefixes are for? I suppose they're a bit > tedious to use (what with having to inject the id of the child row > into the clean_data of the parent row and shoving the whole thing into > a transaction) but not that bad. I've got some somewhat non-trivial > code involving four interrelated objects being added that isn't really > open but I could possibly share if you're having problems. I haven't come across prefixes yet, so I don't know. I guess I'll check it out. My situation really is just that I have relationships that point in the opposite direction than Django expects: they're not going from child to parent, but parent to child. The is preventing me from getting a form object that automatically has the fields I want and saving correctly. > Or is it to do with the scaffolding and things not appearing in the > right order? No, I'm not using the form.as_table(), etc. methods. I'm placing the fields into my template directly. > The point in scaffolding is that it was only made to be knocked down. True, but the more cases that Django can automatically deal with, the better. I feel like it's almost able to handle what I'm doing, with the exception of these few relationships, and it's seems like a bit of a pain to graft on a few things to the scaffolding. Thanks for the reply. I'll look into prefixes, but they're not in the docs yet. I'll ask on the user list. --Justin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
