On Apr 10, 6:51 pm, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The zyons version allows for:
> - constants at the site level (ie max blog comments can be different
> on different sites)

True, site-awareness would be a definite benefit that I hadn't yet
included.

> - allows users (registered and anonymous) to set their preferences
> (like in a user profile)

I had also started some preliminary work on a user preferences
structure, but I found that the auth system's profile setup was
sufficient for most needs (though I do like that you extended it to
anonymous users as well). Also, I don't think I'd want user
preferences tied in with this contrib anyway, as those are really two
different features. And yes, I know you were just stating what yours
supports, rather than recommending mine do the same.

> - is not set at the model level, but at the application level

I like the recent proposals to make it optional whether it is placed
on the model or the application. While many of the arguments here so
far have been for application-level constants, my project (and I
expect many others) makes more sense with these on models, as they
really control core model behavior. Options are good.

-Gul


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to