On Mar 31, 5:19 pm, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are people doing triage regularly to check for duplicates; > > however, there are a large number of tickets and this one -- as > > mentioned above -- happened during the development sprint when there > > was already a large amount of ticket activity. Try not to take it > > personally or allege unfairness; in all likelihood, it was just a > > mix-up that happened in the clamor of the sprint. > > Thank you for explanation. Now I see that it's all about sprint. But > it's still feels very bad when you see some other patch merged when > you have the same thing (even that small) done earlier.
First, I am very sorry to have caused so much of pain to you. I totally overlooked your ticket (just missed it) in an urge to contribute during the sprint. Will be careful from the next time. The patch for ticket #6789 too was pushed in after lot of reluctance from the devs because it still did not solve the problem of preventing the name clash during deployment. Second regarding getting rid of the INVALID_PROJECT_NAMES. I agree with James Bennett. Another thing is that your current patch (as on 31/3/08) let's people name their project "test" which the INVALID_PROJECT_NAMES was preventing earlier. Sorry once more. -- Cheers Thejaswi Puthraya --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
