I have a concern with calling it beta. It would be difficult to sell a commercial product based on a beta framework. How long do you expect to remain in beta?
Is there a reason you cannot call it just 1.0 thanks Ashish On Apr 18, 9:59 am, "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:47 PM, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can we start setting some milestones so SVN stops being SVN :) > > > E.g. a .97 release, or .96.2 or something. > > My preference would be to finish up newforms-admin and > queryset-refactor, then release a 1.0 beta. Given that SVN has a > number of tricky/backwards-incompatible changes (everything-Unicode > and template auto-escaping), it'd be less of a hassle in the long term > if we included all of those changes in one big release. > > Adrian > > -- > Adrian Holovaty > holovaty.com | everyblock.com | djangoproject.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
