On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Thejaswi Puthraya < thejaswi.puthr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mar 23, 6:42 am, James Bennett <ubernost...@gmail.com> wrote: > [snipped] > > Is there any reason behind that? I know there's always some wariness > > when it comes to relying on a third-party service for a Django > > feature, but Akismet seems to be the gold standard for this and > > providing at least a CommentModerator subclass which supports it would > > probably be a big win for ease of use (if it's not there, writing one > > will likely be the first thing most people do when setting up > > moderation). > > The only reason I can think of is that it relies on a third-party > service. > I will leave the decision to you folks on it's inclusion. I am a -0 on > this > because the feature can be easily used without much effort. > > > > > I agree with Thejaswi, there are a great many possible items for which we've said "this works fine as an external app, it doesn't need to be in contrib". I see no reason that this should be different. Alex -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." --Voltaire "The people's good is the highest law."--Cicero --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
