On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Luke Plant <l.plant...@cantab.net> wrote: > > On Sunday 25 October 2009 07:22:27 Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > >> I'm keen to see a resolution to this problem. To that end, I'm >> interested in hearing specific criticisms or concerns with the >> current backend proposal. I'm also interested in any alternate >> approaches to this problem. > > I'm completely fine on this proposal. Apparently I voted '-0', I'm > not sure precisely why as I didn't leave any specific comment, but I > would change that to +0 now (I have no specific need for it myself, > but can see that it's an important improvement for lots of people, and > it can be implemented cleanly). > > I presume that the only built-in email backends would be the existing > SMTP one, one for testing (which is just a code shuffle really), and a > 'write to standard out' one for debugging (which is trivial and > completely un-critical anyway), so this doesn't really add any > maintenance burden to Django. > > Regards, > > Luke > > -- > A common mistake that people make when trying to design something > completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete > fools. -- Douglas Adams > > Luke Plant || http://lukeplant.me.uk/ > > > >
Amusingly it appears that since Jannis got his wings^H^H^H^H^H^H commit bit his -1 became a veto :) Alex -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Voltaire "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero "Code can always be simpler than you think, but never as simple as you want" -- Me --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---