On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:43 PM, orokusaki <flashdesign...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Karen. I've been hushed so many times about this, yet there
> seems to be a growing concern (hence the search traffic, and number of
> results) about why you can't naturally do this with Django's built-in
> serializer.

I have no problem if you want to advocate for this idea, but let's
keep the hyperbole under control.

I see absolutely no evidence for your claim for a "growing concern".

* The ticket in question is 9 months old; and has 4 comments on it,
two of which are procedural "closed, wontfix". Compare and contrast
with #7052 or #2070 to see what an *active* ticket looks like.

 * The google search you present as evidence of "growing concern" has
plenty of false positives, including:

"cache_page takes a single argument: the cache timeout, in seconds.
.... The cache module, django.core.cache, has a cache object that's
automatically created ..."

"I have a single file and need to serialize multiple objects of the
same class when ever a new object is created. I can't store them in
arrays as I need to ..."

 * Even if you accept the google search results as meaningful, 5800
documents is hardly a crushing number. For comparison "Django
serialize multiple objects" returns 4910 results.

If you want to make an argument for allowing single-object
serialization, I'm happy to entertain that discussion. However, appeal
to popularity shouldn't form part of that discussion. Doing things to
be popular didn't work in high school, and I don't see why it should
start working with Django. We (the core) will make a judgement based
on the merits of a proposal, not based on some desire to do the
"popular" thing (although there's no reason the two shouldn't
coincide).

It's also worth keeping in mind that this feature would be a feature
addition, and therefore will need to wait until Django 1.3 at this
point.

I would also point out that personally, I have a very high internal
resistance to tinkering with the current serialization framework, in
view of the fact that what is needed is a wholesale reworking of the
framework to allow for better customization.

Yours,
Russ Magee %-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to