Great idea, I'd like to see this implemented too. Running a memcached instance for small sites seems like overkill.
I'm willing to help write whatever code is necessary. Silvio On May 24, 4:21 am, Julien Phalip <jpha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Several people have expressed interest in ticket #12831, which has > also been marked as DDN. So I thought the next step would be to bring > it up on this list - let me know if that's not the right thing to do. > > Basically, I think that it would make sense and that it would be very > useful if a new setting was introduced to allow the systematic > addition of a prefix to avoid key collisions across multiple site > instances, that is for all cacheing operations, not just for per-site > cacheing (which is currently possible with the > CACHE_MIDDLEWARE_KEY_PREFIX setting). > > What do you guys think about this? Does this ticket have a chance to > be accepted or is it fundamentally a bad idea? > > Many thanks. > > Kind regards, > > Julien > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
