On 8 June 2010 18:30, Gonzalo Saavedra <gonzalosaave...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm +1 on the optional "with" parameter for {% include %}. -1 on
> adding a new tag for this.
>
> I also use {% with %}{% include %} a lot in templates but we should
> follow with/blocktrans syntax for consistency:
>
> {% include "part.html" with obj.title|capfirst as title and "large"
> as main_class %}
Was about to propose the same thing :)
> A related proposal for the "with" tag: It'd be nice to support more
> than one variable definition (as blocktrans does):
>
> {% with "a" as var1 and "b" as var2 %}...{% endwith %}
>
> The current solution is nesting "with" tags, which is not very pretty.
>
As the next step to make something happen is to create a ticket, I
found this on trac: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7817
I'm willing to improve the existing patch, so I assigned it to myself.
The ticket is marked as DDN, so I guess this thread is a request to
accept it.
--
Łukasz Rekucki
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
