On Mar 27, 5:48 am, "G.Boutsioukis" <gboutsiou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, I'm thinking about submitting a proposal for template compilation > and I'm posting this as a request for more info. > > In particular, I remember this project being discussed last year and I > pretty much assumed that Alex Gaynor's proposal would have been > accepted(I see he's listed as a mentor this year BTW). What was the > rationale behind the decision to reject it? Unless, of course, it was > made on his part. > > In any case, any other comment around compatibility, speed or other > concerns would also be helpful.
In the other concerns department: for many workloads template compilation itself won't be that big of a benefit. There is a relatively big speed bottleneck in L10N related stuff. If you are rendering a big table of integers, if I recall correctly about 30-40% of time is used in localizing the representation of those integers. If you are rendering floats it will be more, and if dates/datetimes it will probably be 90%+. So, it would be important to see how to reduce the impact of L10N when trying to make template rendering faster. The L10N rendering was made faster in tickets #14290 and #14306. There is some low-hanging fruit in #14297 which never got applied. I don't mean to say that this is a reason not to implement template compilation, just to say that for some workloads the gain of template compilation is not going to be _that_ big. And in the case of integer rendering, it would be reasonable to still expect a speedup of nearly 50%. - Anssi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
