On Aug 19, 1:25 am, Paul McMillan <p...@mcmillan.ws> wrote: > I added some test cases and cleaned the code up a bit. I believe sure > this solution is backwards compatible (we're adding the string > conversion, something that shouldn't have been possible before), but > I'd like input from some other people. > > -Paul > > [1]https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16494
I took a look of the patch. The patch is backwards compatible, but the problem is that I don't think the current implementation is correct. It consumes the iterator multiple times. See the comments in the ticket for details. - Anssi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
