> I was thinking of adding a recaptcha implementation, based on the work > of others, if that would work with licenses. But probably that choice > would indeed introduce an external (unwanted) dependency.
Yeah... it's really a tricky problem. That solution is probably best as an external app. Some users deploy Django apps with no net access at all. > About ticket 16860, I believe that to be over my head for now. In your > opinion, is that ticket tied to the User discussion, about a more > flexible/abstract User model (ticket 3011)? It's tied to it, but 3011 is really hairy, and I believe we can do good work in 16860 with or without the changes under discussion in 3011. I don't know when we will sort out 3011, but the stuff in 16860 can happen on a different timeframe. > And/Or do you believe we have to deal with database migration first? That would be nice, but I think we can work with what we currently have. -Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
