if trac maintain is paiful maybe this link can be helpful CommercialServices – The Trac Project -> http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/CommercialServices
در ۲۴ آوریل ۲۰۱۲، ساعت ۲۰:۲۲، Aaron C. de Bruyn <aa...@heyaaron.com> نوشته: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 22:30, Tai Lee <real.hu...@mrmachine.net> wrote: > > This seems odd to me. Django is generally a very open and community > oriented > > project, which strives to consult with the community and achieve a > > consensus, resorting to a BDFL decision when necessary, after all sides > have > > put their case. > > You're right. Speaking as a 'developer' who has contributed something > like 14 lines of code to Django ever, evar, I think everyone should > listen to me tell you why Microsoft's Visual Source Save 5.0* is the > best. > > * It's not 'distributed' like all those new-fangled systems. Too many > people working on a project at the same time introduces bugs. > * Single point of control. Someone needs to review and test > everything. If they go on vacation for a week, development should > stop and everyone else should go on vacation too. > * Harder to fork. We don't need 50,000 forks of Django floating > around. It'd be confusing. > * Backed by a company with billions of dollars. This will ensure > innovation, and prompt bug fixing. > * Paid support. If something goes wrong with the database that stores > the code, we can hold a Django bakesale to raise money to pay for them > to recover it. > > Any arguments to my points will be taken as a personal attack because > you're attacking my personal choice of RCS after all. ;) > > Hopefully everyone realizes that was a joke by this point. > > But seriously, getting a bunch of geeks to decide on 'the best' RCS > will go over as well as deciding on the best text editor, the best IDE > to use for developing with Django, the best desktop environment, the > best distro, the best religion, or any number of other unresolved > discussions raging on millions of forums around the internets. > > I personally have invested myself in developing with Django as a > framework. As an 'end user' of the framework, I trust the core > developers to make sound decisions about its future--including which > RCS to use. They are the ones who will be most impacted by the change > after all. > > -A > > * (No, I really don't want Microsoft's Visual Source Safe. Nobody wants > that.) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. > > -- > با تشکر > افاضاتی > http://www.efazati.org > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
