So is my example good enough? Have you tried using it? בתאריך יום שישי, 15 במרץ 2013 13:17:11 UTC+3, מאת Aymeric Augustin: > > On 15 mars 2013, at 09:22, Omer Katz <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > Doesn't the fact that the patch makes the code clearer is a reason > enough for a merge (providing that there will be tests attached to it and > documentation)? > > > Hi Omer, > > This patch isn't only a refactoring; it adds a new feature. Otherwise you > wouldn't be talking about documentation. > > Each feature added to Django creates a burden: > - for users of Django, who must learn to use it; > - for the core team, who must maintain it for the foreseeable future. > > To be accepted, a new feature must: > (a) provide benefits that clearly outweigh these costs > (b) not get in the way of future improvements — as much as can be > foreseen. > > Unfortunately (a) the benefits of your PR still aren't clear and (b) > judging by the discussion, your abstraction doesn't match very well the > needs of most users, and I suspect it could hinder further efforts to make > per-environment settings (the actual problem) easier to define. > > -- > Aymeric. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
