So is my example good enough? Have you tried using it? בתאריך יום שישי, 15 במרץ 2013 13:17:11 UTC+3, מאת Aymeric Augustin: > > On 15 mars 2013, at 09:22, Omer Katz <omer...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > Doesn't the fact that the patch makes the code clearer is a reason > enough for a merge (providing that there will be tests attached to it and > documentation)? > > > Hi Omer, > > This patch isn't only a refactoring; it adds a new feature. Otherwise you > wouldn't be talking about documentation. > > Each feature added to Django creates a burden: > - for users of Django, who must learn to use it; > - for the core team, who must maintain it for the foreseeable future. > > To be accepted, a new feature must: > (a) provide benefits that clearly outweigh these costs > (b) not get in the way of future improvements — as much as can be > foreseen. > > Unfortunately (a) the benefits of your PR still aren't clear and (b) > judging by the discussion, your abstraction doesn't match very well the > needs of most users, and I suspect it could hinder further efforts to make > per-environment settings (the actual problem) easier to define. > > -- > Aymeric. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
