On 13 avr. 2013, at 22:13, Jeremy Dunck <jdu...@gmail.com> wrote: > After reading that ticket, I'm not sure what Alex and I are > disagreeing on. I was suggesting using django.utils.simplejson > internally until it's removed, so that at least people could be > consistent with django itself. That way, DjangoJSONEncoder would be a > simplejson.JSONEncoder (if simplejson is installed) until we remove > the shim.
I see — I hadn't understood that you were proposing this. > Anyway, since we've already deprecated utils.simplejson, since we've > already done the damage here, and since doing a release to fix this is > probably not going to help that many people (they've either already > fixed their backwards-incompat or aren't planning on going to 1.5 any > time soon)... maybe I agree we should leave it alone. Yes, maybe we could have handled this differently, but at this point the cure would be worse than the disease :| -- Aymeric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
