So, there won't be a GSoC project for this, but it would be a shame to let the lengthy discussion and momentum generated go to waste. Can a decision on this matter be made and implemented regardless of the GSoC projects?
Personally, I'm all for it, mostly because of the speed gained, which would finally allow ticket #15667 <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15667>to be solved, which is a really important one to me because it addresses one of the core modules of Django and one which is behaving pretty sloppy compared to the better ones, in my humble opinion. On Sunday, March 16, 2014 6:07:14 PM UTC+1, Christopher Medrela wrote: > > Hello! I'm sorry for such long time without any feedback. Unfortunately, > I'm > not going to send Django proposal. My original plan was to send two > proposals: > one for Django and one for Breeze (Scala numerical processing library) but > I > lack time and I will focus on Breeze. Therefore, I won't have enough time > to > work at adding Jinja2 support this summer. > > Thank you very much for all responses! Lots of DTL aspects were discussed > here > and we reached consensus in some issues (like adding out-of-the-box > support of > Jinja2) so I hope that the time you spent at this thread is not lost time. > Maybe there will be some other students eager to work at template system? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/bec73964-2fde-4b2c-a0f8-7ccf4ff9d149%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
