And for the last month or so a patch has existed and feedback has been requested. Performance was one of the concerns mentioned, so download Curtis' patch, and test that it works for your use case. He has asked for feedback a number of times. Unless you try it out, I fear that you won't be seeing multi-line tags.
I think it's fairly obvious that this idea has gained traction - so go and test the implementation: https://github.com/funkybob/django/compare/multiline-templates<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ffunkybob%2Fdjango%2Fcompare%2Fmultiline-templates&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNESXRgM1CQC1ENBNez82YR99dM5nA> On Thursday, 17 April 2014 07:43:45 UTC+10, Andre Terra wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:46 PM, imfletcher <jbr...@gmail.com<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> to say this shouldn't be supported because its not aesthetically pleasing >> is beyond bizarre, IMO. If you don't like it, keep it on one line. If you >> are so offended by it that you cannot stand seeing it, ask your team not to >> do it. heck, write a script to remove the whitespace upon checkin. To >> demand the entire world comply.. well, at least remove the B from the title. > > > > I *absolutely* agree. This is too long a discussion on a matter of > personal style, when many other things are much pressing. This isn't even > worth being put into a DEP, in my opinion. It is precisely the sort of > small feature that isn't worth discussing so thoroughly. 70+ e-mails over > this subject is a bit too much, if you ask me. I haven't taken the time to > count the votes, but I would hazard a guess that the score is about +75 vs > -3 at the moment. > > The complexity of long tags is going to be present, whether or not we > allow developers to break them into multiple lines. Therefore, the argument > against multiline tags on the currently proposed DEP is absolutely moot. > Even if we account for the fact that developers might find it easier to > write slopping code after we allow for multiline tags, the same could be > said of any other part of Django, so that argument doesn't hold water > either. > > Just my 2 cents.. > > > Cheers, > AT > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/67d5028e-80d7-4fdd-ba99-7b626b163b75%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
