On 12 Jun 2016 2:00 a.m., "Tim Graham" <timogra...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> 1. It might be nice if projects had more than one shepherd so there's not
a single point of failure. Of course, if all members of the maintenance
team end up joining the team, then there's no issue.

It depends how the role of work is split between them; I think it depends
on the project too. I'd rather not over legislate here and let us have some
leeway based on context. I agree we should aim for this if the shepherd
role is very busy for that project, but with a maintenance team we
hopefully have a ready source of knowledgeable potential new core team
members.

>
>
> 2. Re: "The main project documentation does not have to be hosted inside
the main Django documentation, but should be under an official Django
domain if possible, and link back to with the main Django documentation
where it makes sense."
>
>
> I'd rather not get into hosting more documentation on djangoproject.org
if possible, as there's a non-trivial maintenance burden there. I imagine
it would be easier for the project's maintenance team to make adjustments
in the readthedocs UI instead of bothering the Django ops team in the event
of any problems.

This is why I said domain, not infrastructure; I'd like us to host on RTD
with a custom django project subdomain so we retain control of the URLs in
the long term but we can pay them to host and deal with it all in the short
term.

>
>
> 3. Did you envision any involvement from the Django Fellow in these
projects? To date, I haven't really had much involvement with any of the
ancillary projects like localflavor and formtools.

I didn't, mostly as I didn't want to add more responsibilities to the
existing set; do you think we should? I think asking the project to come
with a plan for that stuff is helpful, and if it would need Fellow
involvement, the proposal should include them as part of the maintenance
team maybe?

Andrew

>
>
> On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 3:01:23 AM UTC-4, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>>
>> Just to update on this, there was some good feedback on the draft for
writing and clarity, and it's now made it into an official draft, located
here:
https://github.com/django/deps/blob/master/draft/0007-official-projects.rst
>>
>> If you'd like to read through the draft and raise discussion points or
opinions on the plan, now is the time!
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Andrew Godwin <and...@aeracode.org>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I've started on an "official projects" process DEP as I discussed here
a while back, to formalise the process of adopting non-core packages as
repositories under the official Django organisation, with a view to taking
Channels on this route (and hopefully including the existing localflavor
under this too).
>>>
>>> Pull request is up here: https://github.com/django/deps/pull/23 -
comments welcome.
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/2d85ebf4-2699-4faf-bb3a-d9c213b76fe2%40googlegroups.com
.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAFwN1ur1ZtBP12FBzd47xCcE298JSdQYrbgzijka_EGVdrguVw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to