Hey guys, Rafał is probably right. I will double check some stuff on our side first, but I guess the solution here is for us to tweak the plural rule in Transifex.
We will come back with a position soon. Thanks, On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 7:28:26 AM UTC-7, Rafał P. wrote: > > Hi Dimitris, > in the .po files for django project there is a discrepancy from the CLDR > spec > <http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/27/supplemental/language_plural_rules.html#pl>; > > the rule is: > Plural-Forms:nplurals=4;plural=(n==1?0:(n%10>=2&&n%10<=4)&&(n%100<12||n% > 100>=14)?1:n!=1&&(n%10>=0&&n%10<=1)||(n%10>=5&&n%10<=9)||(n%100>=12&&n%100 > <=14)?2:3); > but according to the specification > <http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/27/supplemental/language_plural_rules.html#pl> > it > should be: > Plural-Forms:nplurals=4;plural=(n==1?0:(n%10>=2&&n%10<=4)&&(n%100<12||n% > 100>14)?1:n!=1&&(n%10>=0&&n%10<=1)||(n%10>=5&&n%10<=9)||(n%100>=12&&n%100 > <=14)?2:3); > (14 should be excluded from the range for 'few'). I don't know if this > should be handled by Transifex or the project's team. > > W dniu piątek, 28 kwietnia 2017 15:31:07 UTC+2 użytkownik Dimitris Glezos > napisał: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> As Fòram mentioned, our team at Transifex follows closely the upstream >> CLDR >> <http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/27/supplemental/language_plural_rules.html#pl> >> spec. >> If they're wrong, I suggest having a discussion there and push them to fix. >> >> -d >> >> -- >> Dimitris Glezos >> Founder & CEO, Transifex >> http://www.transifex.com/ >> ᐧ >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django internationalization and localization" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-i18n+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-i18n@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-i18n. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
