#1990: [patch] Oracle support in latest trunk
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  tzellman          |        Owner:  adrian      
     Type:  enhancement       |       Status:  new         
 Priority:  normal            |    Milestone:  Version 0.92
Component:  Database wrapper  |      Version:  SVN         
 Severity:  normal            |   Resolution:              
 Keywords:  ORACLE            |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment (by anonymous):

 Looking at the patch code, I see that the offset/limit implementation is
 done using Oracle's row_number analytic function rather than using the
 rownum pseudo-column. It seems to me that rownum would be simpler and
 better. Tom Kyte
 
[http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:::::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID:44376372354520#44460244068927
 says]:
 {{{
 If you use row_number() when you can use rownum (SHOULD use rownum) the
 only thing you'll achieve:
 
     lack of performance
     increased resource usage
 
 Your choice.
 }}}
 
 Also, I think the row_number function works from 9i onward. That shouldn't
 be a huge roadblock since most have moved on from 8i by now.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1990>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.org/>
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to