#19755: Incremental filter
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: paulox@… | Owner: nobody
Type: New feature | Status: new
Component: contrib.admin | Version: master
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: filter, admin | Triage Stage: Design
Has patch: 0 | decision needed
Needs tests: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
| UI/UX: 1
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by slurms):
* needs_better_patch: => 0
* stage: Unreviewed => Design decision needed
* needs_tests: => 0
* needs_docs: => 0
Comment:
I was just about to close this as worksforme, because your description was
a bit ambiguous -- you're proposing to remove choices from the list
filters if you're already filtering on another value and the filtered set
no longer contains all the choices.
i.e. you have three people:
{{{
[{
'name': 'Bob',
'hair_color': 'brown',
'eye_color': 'blue'
}, {
'name': 'Bruce',
'hair_color': 'brown',
'eye_color': 'hazel'
}, {
'name': 'Brett',
'hair_color': 'ginger',
'eye_color': 'brown'
}]
}}}
and when you filter on brown hair, the list filter for eye color no longer
lists brown, as there are now only two people in the filtered set and they
have blue and hazel eyes.
Seems like an OK idea, though it does require backwards-incompatible
changes to django.contrib.admin. Marking as DDN.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/19755#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
