#21012: Provide shared "caches" dict to avoid creating multiple cache class
instances.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  FunkyBob             |                    Owner:  aaugustin
         Type:                       |                   Status:  assigned
  Cleanup/optimization               |                  Version:  master
    Component:  Core (Cache system)  |               Resolution:
     Severity:  Normal               |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
     Keywords:                       |      Needs documentation:  0
    Has patch:  1                    |  Patch needs improvement:  1
  Needs tests:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by apollo13):

 I just had a quick chat with Ned Batchelder on #python and he suggested
 to:
  * Use just one dictionary instead of the three, which seems sensible to
 me. (eg `self._cache, self._expire_info, self._lock =
 _cache_info.setdefault(name, ({}, {}, {}))` )
  * Use read/lock/read in `__init__` to make clear what the code is doing
 and not rely on changing (python) implementations

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21012#comment:15>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/066.0e4296d345890055b4a6a37d78f1d303%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to