#21940: Consistent contribute_to_class's virtual_only -------------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: Kronuz | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Uncategorized | Version: 1.6 Severity: Normal | Keywords: Triage Stage: Unreviewed | Has patch: 0 Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0 -------------------------------+-------------------- I needed to create a field like class for my django project and I wanted it to be a virtual field... `virtual_only` is there for that reason, but my field was inheriting from `FileField`, and `FileField.contribute_to_class()` doesn't take `virtual_only` and so it doesn't passes it to `Field.contribute_to_class()`. I believe passing `virtual_only` attribute should be consistent across the source code. I'm attaching a simple patch to fix this. One warning would be for custom fields made by users which have their own `contribute_to_class` (those will need to be changed to properly receive the `virtual_only` parameter as optional.)
-- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21940> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/049.33a6fda62bdba2175de00833f044a9e8%40djangoproject.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.