#22247: Shouldn't it say "Downstream Caches" instead of "Upstream Caches"? -------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: valgarv@… | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Documentation | Version: 1.6 Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0 Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0 Easy pickings: 1 | UI/UX: 0 -------------------------------+------------------------------------ Changes (by timo):
* needs_better_patch: => 0 * needs_tests: => 0 * easy: 0 => 1 * needs_docs: => 0 * type: Uncategorized => Bug * stage: Unreviewed => Accepted Comment: It seems the current wording has been in use since 2006, but unless anyone disagrees, I would agree that "downstream" means "toward the client" and upstream "toward the server". -- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/22247#comment:1> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/073.41f6ffa9867c19d2ff3744b430bb3f2e%40djangoproject.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.