#25263: How closely we should adhere to PEP 257
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  techdragon           |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:                       |                   Status:  new
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Documentation        |                  Version:  master
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Old description:

> Currently the documentation contained in Django's source code has many
> places where it could be improved, most significantly by having more of
> it. In order to help discover undocumented code, I ran PEP 257 on the
> entire project. The thousands of warnings were quite a shock and it was
> pretty obvious that a pull request for all of the changes would be too
> large.
>
> It seemed like a good idea to open this ticket and find out if continuing
> to create new tickets and pull requests for more of this kind of
> documentation improvement is in line with the overall project code
> standards. I'm opening a pull request that contains a partial cleanup of
> the existing documentation inside 'django.views'.
> https://github.com/django/django/pull/5131

New description:

 Currently the documentation contained in Django's source code has many
 places where it could be improved, most significantly by having more of
 it. In order to help discover undocumented code, I ran
 [https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pep257 PEP 257] on the entire project. The
 thousands of warnings were quite a shock and it was pretty obvious that a
 pull request for all of the changes would be too large.

 It seemed like a good idea to open this ticket and find out if continuing
 to create new tickets and pull requests for more of this kind of
 documentation improvement is in line with the overall project code
 standards. I'm opening a pull request that contains a partial cleanup of
 the existing documentation inside 'django.views'.
 https://github.com/django/django/pull/5131

--

Comment (by timgraham):

 Feel free to raise the idea on the DevelopersMailingList. Personally, I
 don't think requiring docstrings for everything is needed and I don't care
 for whitespace around class docstrings.

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25263#comment:6>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/068.8534bceefa125bbed74698e0c4a4b5db%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to