#32281: Prefetech Object - to_attr has ambiguous behavior when using a related
lookup
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Tal Perry            |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  New feature          |                   Status:  closed
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  3.1
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  wontfix
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Mariusz Felisiak):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => wontfix
 * component:  Uncategorized => Database layer (models, ORM)
 * type:  Uncategorized => New feature


Old description:

> **Code Example**
> {{{
> from django.db.models import Prefetch
>
> p = Prefetch("a_set", to_attr="my_a")
> assert p.prefetch_to == "my_a"
>
> p = Prefetch("b__a_set", to_attr="my_a")
> assert p.prefetch_to == "my_a", p.prefetch_to
>
> }}}
>
> That last assertion fails because p.prefetch_to == "b__my_a"
>
> **Description and use case**
> We have a models X, Y and Z
> Z has a foreign key to Y and Y has a foreign key to Z
> We'd like to fetch X with all of it's Z's using prefetch related and to
> be able to set the attribute to "z"
>
> But as above, this doesn't seem to work.
>
> The
> [https://github.com/django/django/blob/bb64b99b78a579cb2f6178011a4cf9366e634438/django/db/models/query.py#L1570-L1587
> relevant Django code] seems to ignore this use case (or discourage it?)
> and instead puts to "z" attribute on each "Y"
>

> {{{
>             self.prefetch_to =
> LOOKUP_SEP.join(lookup.split(LOOKUP_SEP)[:-1] + [to_attr])
>
> }}}
>

>
> ----
>
> I assume "fixing this" is a breaking change, but could we do an explicit
> parameter for prefetch_to ?At the moment we're setting it manually after
> creating the prefetch object

New description:

 **Code Example**
 {{{
 from django.db.models import Prefetch

 p = Prefetch("a_set", to_attr="my_a")
 assert p.prefetch_to == "my_a"

 p = Prefetch("b__a_set", to_attr="my_a")
 assert p.prefetch_to == "my_a", p.prefetch_to

 }}}

 That last assertion fails because `p.prefetch_to == "b__my_a"`

 **Description and use case**
 We have a models X, Y and Z
 Z has a foreign key to Y and Y has a foreign key to Z
 We'd like to fetch X with all of it's Z's using prefetch related and to be
 able to set the attribute to "z"

 But as above, this doesn't seem to work.

 The
 
[https://github.com/django/django/blob/bb64b99b78a579cb2f6178011a4cf9366e634438/django/db/models/query.py#L1570-L1587
 relevant Django code] seems to ignore this use case (or discourage it?)
 and instead puts to "z" attribute on each "Y"


 {{{
             self.prefetch_to =
 LOOKUP_SEP.join(lookup.split(LOOKUP_SEP)[:-1] + [to_attr])

 }}}



 ----

 I assume "fixing this" is a breaking change, but could we do an explicit
 parameter for prefetch_to ?At the moment we're setting it manually after
 creating the prefetch object

--

Comment:

 Thanks for this ticket, however IMO this is an expected behavior. In the
 second example `a_set` is a field lookup on `b` so we can change its name
 to `my_a` (in `b`) but we cannot assign it directly to the main object, it
 will be misleading.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32281#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/066.3b3979c4b7ae5fe96a399933975489ae%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to