#33681: Redis client OPTIONS don't work as documented, which makes setting Redis
timeouts difficult
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  bpicolo              |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:                       |                   Status:  new
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Core (Cache system)  |                  Version:  4.0
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by bpicolo:

Old description:

> Hello! First Django interaction, so please let me know how better I can
> give info here.
>
> I discovered unintentionally that there's no default socket_timeout set
> for Redis cache connections. This is an issue on it's own (unsafe default
> that's a particularly hard issue to track down), but in trying to set
> those timeouts, I hit some tough edges of documentation/usage.
>
> The cache documentation says that the OPTIONS object is passed to the
> third-party connection class for connections backed by third-party
> libraries
> [https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/topics/cache/#:~:text=cache%20backends%20backed%20by%20a%20third%2Dparty%20library%20will%20pass%20their%20options%20directly%20to%20the%20underlying%20cache%20library
> is passed to the underlying library connection object]. This is
> reaffirmed for the redis cache specifically
> [https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/topics/cache/#:~:text=The%20Memcached%20and%20Redis%20backends%20pass%20the%20contents%20of%20OPTIONS%20as%20keyword%20arguments%20to%20the%20client%20constructors
> here].
>
> Right now, though, these OPTIONS are passed to the
> [https://github.com/django/django/blob/7119f40c9881666b6f9b5cf7df09ee1d21cc8344/django/core/cache/backends/redis.py#L30
> first-party RedisCacheClient object], so you can't pass in options
> expected by the redis connection pool [https://github.com/redis/redis-
> py/blob/master/redis/connection.py#L1283 link]. In that sense,
> RedisCacheClient is being treated as a "first-party" cache according to
> these docs, but it defers directly to the redis library.
>
> One could do a variety of subclassing to make this work, but there's
> quite a few layers of indirection here, so it's hard to identify exactly
> what one should subclass in order to get arguments to the connection
> class appropriately.
>
> (For now, my workaround is take advantage of the from_url behavior where
> the connection class [https://github.com/redis/redis-
> py/blob/master/redis/connection.py#L1274 pulls arguments out of the
> connection query string], but this isn't straightforward and feels
> brittle).
>
> There are a couple of options here – revising documentation or changing
> behavior (or both).
>
> In my ideal case, it would be great for it to be easy to pass down
> explicit socket and other timeouts. To me, that suggests updating
> behavior is ideal, because the documentation would potentially lead folk
> down a path of tough to navigate behavior.

New description:

 Hello! First Django interaction, so please let me know how better I can
 give info here.

 I discovered unintentionally that there's no default socket_timeout set
 for Redis cache connections. This is an issue on it's own (unsafe default
 that's a particularly hard issue to track down), but in trying to set
 those timeouts, I hit some tough edges of documentation/usage.

 The cache documentation says that the OPTIONS object is passed to the
 third-party connection class for connections backed by third-party
 libraries
 
[https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/topics/cache/#:~:text=cache%20backends%20backed%20by%20a%20third%2Dparty%20library%20will%20pass%20their%20options%20directly%20to%20the%20underlying%20cache%20
 for connections backed by third-party libraries]. This is reaffirmed for
 the redis cache specifically
 
[https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/topics/cache/#:~:text=The%20Memcached%20and%20Redis%20backends%20pass%20the%20contents%20of%20OPTIONS%20as%20keyword%20arguments%20to%20the%20client%20constructors
 here].

 Right now, though, these OPTIONS are passed to the
 
[https://github.com/django/django/blob/7119f40c9881666b6f9b5cf7df09ee1d21cc8344/django/core/cache/backends/redis.py#L30
 first-party RedisCacheClient object], so you can't pass in options
 expected by the redis connection pool [https://github.com/redis/redis-
 py/blob/master/redis/connection.py#L1283 link]. In that sense,
 RedisCacheClient is being treated as a "first-party" cache according to
 these docs, but it defers directly to the redis library.

 One could do a variety of subclassing to make this work, but there's quite
 a few layers of indirection here, so it's hard to identify exactly what
 one should subclass in order to get arguments to the connection class
 appropriately.

 (For now, my workaround is take advantage of the from_url behavior where
 the connection class [https://github.com/redis/redis-
 py/blob/master/redis/connection.py#L1274 pulls arguments out of the
 connection query string], but this isn't straightforward and feels
 brittle).

 There are a couple of options here – revising documentation or changing
 behavior (or both).

 In my ideal case, it would be great for it to be easy to pass down
 explicit socket and other timeouts. To me, that suggests updating behavior
 is ideal, because the documentation would potentially lead folk down a
 path of tough to navigate behavior.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/33681#comment:3>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018094c5cfc4-b59545c3-3336-4a2e-9f5d-1a34f549d6c3-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to