#34964: Reversing the order of Q objects in a CheckConstraint generates a 
migration
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Jacob Walls          |                    Owner:  Jacob
         Type:                       |  Walls
  Cleanup/optimization               |                   Status:  assigned
    Component:  Migrations           |                  Version:  dev
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  noop                 |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by Mariusz Felisiak):

 I have doubts, in my experience database optimizers are sometimes very
 picky and the order of statements may be significant even for commutative
 operators.

 Is it worth changing?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34964#comment:8>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018bc8ba79d3-8d2b34c5-df2d-496a-ba78-f4b00f32bb92-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to