#34964: Reversing the order of Q objects in a CheckConstraint generates a migration -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Jacob Walls | Owner: Jacob Type: | Walls Cleanup/optimization | Status: assigned Component: Migrations | Version: dev Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: noop | Triage Stage: Accepted Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0 Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0 Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Mariusz Felisiak): I have doubts, in my experience database optimizers are sometimes very picky and the order of statements may be significant even for commutative operators. Is it worth changing? -- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34964#comment:8> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018bc8ba79d3-8d2b34c5-df2d-496a-ba78-f4b00f32bb92-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.