#35147: Document that non-wrapped arithmetic with integer fields might require explicit output_field -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Petar Netev | Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization | Component: Documentation | Version: 5.0 Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: annotate, bitand, | Triage Stage: Accepted filter, integerfield, overflow | Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0 Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0 Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0 -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by Tim Graham):
Replying to [comment:6 Petar Netev]: > Hi Natalia and Simon, > > I would like to prepare the patch, but I would need some clarifications on it. > > - Do we reference the release notes for version 5.0, specifically https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/releases/5.0/#models ? > - Do we reference the documentation of the F() https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/releases/5.0/#models ? > > Simon, can you share the commit related to "I'm fairly certain this relates to a commit meant to address a SQLite crash and a DDOS vector on Postgres only present in 5.0" in order to mention it in the docs improvements? > > Thank you both! -- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35147#comment:8> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018d5830df33-0c9bfe3b-3613-4bc7-86c2-4208fc8c3993-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.