#33497: Database persistent connections do not work with ASGI in 4.0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Stenkar              |                    Owner:  (none)
         Type:  New feature          |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  4.0
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  ASGI, Database,      |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
  async                              |
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by johnthagen):

 For Postgres users, will the new Django 5.1 postgres connection pools
 mitigate this issue? Should ASGI users use this rather than persistent
 connections?

 - https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.1/releases/5.1/#postgresql-
 connection-pools
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/33497#comment:38>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/01070190a1b6ffba-08e20c08-ade0-44bc-9e09-046b15839390-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to