#33497: Database persistent connections do not work with ASGI in 4.0 -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Stenkar | Owner: (none) Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Database layer | Version: 4.0 (models, ORM) | Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: ASGI, Database, | Triage Stage: Accepted async | Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0 Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0 Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0 -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by johnthagen):
For Postgres users, will the new Django 5.1 postgres connection pools mitigate this issue? Should ASGI users use this rather than persistent connections? - https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.1/releases/5.1/#postgresql- connection-pools -- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/33497#comment:38> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/01070190a1b6ffba-08e20c08-ade0-44bc-9e09-046b15839390-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.