#33647: bulk_update and bulk_create silently truncating values for size limited
fields on postgres
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  jerch                |                    Owner:  Rowan
                                     |  Douglas
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  assigned
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  4.0
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Simon Charette):

 When reviewing the currently proposed patch for #23902 it reminded me that
 we also use `Field.db_type` based casting when performing field type
 alteration on Postgres since #25002.

 We ran into the exact same data truncation problem discussed here in
 #28816 by naively using `db_type` casting via `USING` and I only now
 realize that we only fixed in 1378d665a1c85897d951f2ca9618b848fdbba2e7 for
 a subset of the cases.

 We ''fixed'' the problem by not casting when the internal type remains the
 same (e.g. `varfield(255) -> varfield(254)`) but the data loss problem
 persist when moving from something like `integer` as to `varchar(2)` for
 example as `len(str(999)) > 2` obviously.

 It stroke me as yet another location where
 `Field.db_type(parametrized=False)` would be useful as it would allow us
 to
 1. Keep not casting via `USING` when the unparametrized type remain the
 same (what #28816 started doing)
 2. In other case make sure to use `USING %(unparametrized_type)s` to avoid
 silent data truncations

 Here's [https://dryorm.xterm.info/postgres-alter-type-silent-data-
 truncation a DryORM demonstrating the issue]. Not sure if we want a
 standalone ticket or if we should fix all the `db_type` based casting
 issues (`bulk_update`, schema editor) here.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/33647#comment:40>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019bc9945ee8-87f1811c-e705-40f6-9f56-fee367d092d8-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to