#9347: verbose_name option is missing in Model Field reference
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: marcoberi | Owner: nobody
Status: new | Milestone: post-1.0
Component: Documentation | Version: 1.0
Resolution: | Keywords:
Stage: Accepted | Has_patch: 0
Needs_docs: 0 | Needs_tests: 0
Needs_better_patch: 0 |
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by kmtracey):
Any field can have a verbose_name specified. Not sure why you think it is
restricted to relationship fields? The difference between specifying it
for non-related and related is you ''may'' simply specify it as the first
positional argument for any field that is not a !ForeignKey,
!ManyToManyField or !OneToOneField; that is you are not required to use
the verbose_name keyword. But you certainly can. (The reason you cannot
specify it as first positional for the others is that they require
different first positional arguments, so for them you must use the
verbose_name keyword if you want to specify it at all.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9347#comment:4>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
