#11117: placeholder confusion when using aggregated query with extra
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
          Reporter:  slid...@web.de   |         Owner:  nobody
            Status:  closed           |     Milestone:        
         Component:  ORM aggregation  |       Version:  1.0   
        Resolution:  duplicate        |      Keywords:        
             Stage:  Unreviewed       |     Has_patch:  0     
        Needs_docs:  0                |   Needs_tests:  0     
Needs_better_patch:  0                |  
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by russellm):

  * status:  new => closed
  * needs_better_patch:  => 0
  * component:  Database layer (models, ORM) => ORM aggregation
  * needs_tests:  => 0
  * needs_docs:  => 0
  * resolution:  => duplicate

Comment:

 I'm going to close this as a dupe of #11104. It's not a literal duplicate
 - the problem that is being described is different - but the underlying
 cause (mishandling of SQL params) is the same. I'll put a link on #11104
 to ensure that this problem is also fixed.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11117#comment:1>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to