#9475: add(), create(), etc. should be supported by intermedite ManyToMany model
with extra attributes if extra fields can be calculated
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: o...@gezgin.com | Owner: nobody
Status: new | Milestone:
Component: Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: SVN
Resolution: | Keywords:
Stage: Accepted | Has_patch: 1
Needs_docs: 0 | Needs_tests: 0
Needs_better_patch: 1 |
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by anonymous):
Replying to [comment:9 Travis Cline <travis.cl...@gmail.com>]:
> Replying to [comment:8 emulbreh]:
> > Replying to [comment:7 Travis Cline <travis.cl...@gmail.com>]:
> > > Attached is an alternate approach. Will also attach a similar
approach but with an attempt to fall back to a reasonable default.
> >
> > I don't believe the flag should be on `Meta`. The intermediary model
doesn't know which FK fields are used for the m2m relation (at least in
theory there may be more than one m2m relation through the same model).
And you would introduce a model option that has no meaning for most
models.
>
> Yeah, you're right. Not nearly the right place for that to live. I hope
to follow up with a patch that isn't so whack soon.
What's wrong with `9475.m2m_add_remove.r11739.diff` ?
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9475#comment:10>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.
