#15696: Add pre_insert signal to loaddata command
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jonash | Owner: nobody
Type: New | Status: new
feature | Component: Core (Serialization)
Milestone: | Severity: Normal
Version: SVN | Keywords: nonrel
Resolution: | Has patch: 1
Triage Stage: Accepted | Needs tests: 0
Needs documentation: 1 |
Patch needs improvement: 1 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by russellm):
* needs_better_patch: 0 => 1
Comment:
I disagree that a signal is the right way to handle this. Signals, even
when unconnected, have a cost, and this would impose a cost on every
fixture load (and, by extension, every test in every test run) in order to
support what seems to be to be an extreme edge case requirement.
My gut tells me that a better approach would be a custom serializer. That
would isolate the extra cost to the specific deserializer that needs the
extra data conversion features.
Answering your question about tests: the tests should go in the
regressiontests/fixtures_regress test suite; the loaddata command is
tested there as a side effect of testing fixtures themselves.
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/15696#comment:7>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.
