#17198: In admin results can be omitted due to pagination and inadequate
ordering
clauses
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: lukeplant | Owner: julien
Type: Bug | Status: new
Component: contrib.admin | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by julien):
* has_patch: 0 => 1
Comment:
The attach patch ensures that 'pk' is systematically used as an ordering
field in the changelist. Tests are also added for the related ticket
#16819.
It breaks an existing test though (`admin_views.
AdminViewBasicTest.testChangeListSortingPreserveQuerySetOrdering`), which
was added in r16316 to fix #7309. Luke, do you remember the logic for that
test? It seems like it expects the default order to be '-pk', so I'd just
like to check if it's ok to make it 'pk' instead.
Thanks!
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17198#comment:6>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.
