#8565: Comments should use object_id instead of object_pk
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: baumer1122 | Owner: nobody
Type: Uncategorized | Status: reopened
Component: contrib.comments | Version: SVN
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: comments generic | Triage Stage:
object_pk object_id | Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by anonymous):
* status: closed => reopened
* severity: => Normal
* type: => Uncategorized
* easy: => 0
* ui_ux: => 0
* resolution: duplicate =>
Comment:
I don't see how this is a duplicate of 8554, which has to do with casting
the output of object_pk to text. The issue here is the use of "object_pk"
instead of "object_id" has the field name. This non-standard field name
requires anyone who extends it and uses GenericRelation back to use
object_id_field="object_pk". This isn't documented anywhere either.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8565#comment:3>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.
