#18212: GenericIPAddressField does not handle verbose_name and name args like 
other
field types
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  toofishes            |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  closed
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  1.4
  (models, ORM)                      |               Resolution:  invalid
     Severity:  Normal               |             Triage Stage:
     Keywords:  fields               |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  1                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by claudep):

 * status:  new => closed
 * needs_docs:   => 0
 * resolution:   => invalid
 * needs_tests:   => 0
 * needs_better_patch:   => 0


Comment:

 Nothing in the current documentation guarantees that the first argument to
 any field constructor will be the verbose_name.

 For example, GenericIPAddressField is documented as:

 {{{
     class GenericIPAddressField([protocol=both, unpack_ipv4=False,
 **options])
 }}}

 verbose_name should always be used as a keyword parameter, like most other
 field init parameters.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18212#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Reply via email to