#16039: syncdb with --database option fails -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: yedpodtrzitko | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Database layer | Version: 1.4 (models, ORM) | Resolution: Severity: Release blocker | Triage Stage: Design Keywords: | decision needed Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0 Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0 Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by russellm): Replying to [comment:20 mhaligowski]: > Personally, I think that introducing master/slave idea is too complex for just one bug and I don't think that it will introduce any more functionality. Having said that, I would go for the solution '''''contenttypes/permissions go to 'default' unless stated differently in the routers'''''. I hope I understood the idea of the routers correctly. > > Would someone please confirm the idea for the solution is right? If so, I would write the solution. I can confirm that this is almost certainly *not* the right solution. Putting special cases into routing behaviour is something we want to avoid. "Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules." -- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16039#comment:22> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.