#9519: Add QuerySet.bulk_delete() that issues only a single SQL query -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Tarken | Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Database layer | Version: master (models, ORM) | Resolution: Severity: Normal | Triage Stage: Accepted Keywords: database, queryset, | Needs documentation: 0 delete | Patch needs improvement: 0 Has patch: 0 | UI/UX: 0 Needs tests: 0 | Easy pickings: 0 | -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ptone): Yes - the global signal killer context manager is a bad idea - I was thinking of the narrow context of limiting test interactions - where it could be useful - but would be a bad choice for public API. My only hangup on .values().delete() is that I think of values returning data - not objects, so should be decoupled (conceptually) from the DB - and so delete seems to leak back to the DB. That is a statement of my conceptual consistency issue - not that it wouldn't be a clean way to implement it on the internals side. Basically trying to muck with signals enable/disable in any public API is sticky business. I still think a bulk_delete with lots of warning in the docs is the simplest way forward - if there is a good way forward at all. -- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9519#comment:20> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.