On 11/12/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Bryan, > > This technically isn't an error in the docs; it's just a bit > misleading. The "user" in that example wasn't intended to be the user > from the authentication framework -- it's just some generic concept of > "user." > > I've changed the example to use "member" instead of "user," to > underscore the fact that it's some random concept of "member" -- not > the "users" from the authentication system.
Ahhh, now I see. Thanks! Bryan
