Jeremy Dunck wrote: > On 1/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > think adodbapi DOES use parameterization. It's just slightly > > non-standard. (thus, the %s -> ? stuff above) > > I was surprised by this, by the Python DB API allows for parameters in > the string supplied to the provider, and makes it provider-specific. > So it's not non-standard, it's just a surprise. ;-)
Correct...it's definitely within the standard. I misspoke; maybe "less than optimal" would have been a better term? *grin* Note I'm a big fan of adodbapi, though...I use it all the time at work for SQL Server utilities. Good stuff. I've been bitten myself before by the limitation of only qmark-style parameters, though; in porting some Oracle monitoring stuff, I had to do a bit of the find-and-replace myself!
