2006/4/14, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 4/14/06, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simulataneous releases will confuse people and enhance any perception > > that Django is unstable not ready for production work. Parallel branch > > management has really hurt the Zope community for example; there are > > lots of other examples out there. > > +1. My vote is also for converting the M-R branch into trunk and perhaps put the actual trunk as a branch just to mantain security issues with that affect the 0.91 version.
I'll prefer to deal with an alpha M-R version knowing that this is the main trunk than inverting my effort in developing applications that I positivelly know I should remake in order to adapt to the near future development. The M-R should also involve a documentation and examples re-write, as the quality of the documentation is one of the most important factors that diferentiates Django. -- Antoni Aloy López Binissalem - Mallorca Soci de Bulma --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
