agreed :) On 5/16/06, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/17/06, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I just checked in Subversion and it looks like version 0.92 or 0.95 > > was never tagged as a release version. Is that correct? > > Yes. This is correct. > > Just to make this perfectly clear, and head off the confusion that seems to > be reigning: > > The only official Django releases are 0.90 and 0.91. These are pre > magic-removal - they use the old style query syntax, etc. > > THERE HAS NOT BEEN A 0.92 OR 0.95 RELEASE > > The magic-removal stream has been merged to trunk, in the expectation that > it will (soon) be released with an official version number once the bugs > have been ironed out. > > If you are are up to date, and are using the new magic-removal syntax, you > are using the SVN TRUNK, NOT v0.92, and NOT v0.95. > > Sorry for shouting, but there has been a lot of very confused (and > confusing) discussion of bugs in a release that doesn't exist. The existence > of these bugs is the very reason that the formal release hasn't been made - > when v0.95 IS released, it won't have any bugs :-) > > Russ Magee %-) > > > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
