Jorge Gajon wrote:
> I totally agree. > > I certainly would not like to see more complexity added by bundling an > X or Y Ajax library. Better let the developer choose whatever js > library he wants. > > I've been using MochiKit for the client side and SimpleJSON at the > server side which is extremely easy to use. And adding a > '/myobject/(\d+)/json/' url and view is dead simple. So far I don't > see any need to "Add AJAX support to Django", what support? > > As for the bundled admin application, it is a "contributed" > application which could use any ajax library without, it shouldn't > introduce any complexity to "Django as a framework". I agree that there does not seem to be any good reason to tightly bundle django with any such toolkit. However, it would be very nice to see various people that use django a lot present the methods that they think work best with django. Examples, a good guide, a set of recommenations, etc. It would really help those of us that are trying to figure out how we should use such toolkits with django instead of just saying "we do not need to do anything to django for this.. " --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---