Thanks for your advise. I'm short of time right now so I briefly looked at
django's aggregation possibilities.
I'll look into them more deeply tonight.
But I stumbled upon a problem.
Post.objects.values('tags')
Gives me:
FieldError: Invalid field name: 'tags'
In [56]: Post.tags
Post.tags
In [56]: Post.tags
Out[56]: <django.db.models.fields.related.ReverseManyRelatedObjectsDescriptor
object at 0x78f9f0>
Post.tags does exist. Maybe it's because it's a ManyToManyField ? So I tried
Post.objects.values('tags__name'). Still got an error ?
I'm wondering why ?
Op 31-aug-2010, om 09:28 heeft Jirka Vejrazka het volgende geschreven:
>> tags = Tag.objects.all()
>>
>> for t in tags:
>> indexed_tags[t] = Post.objects.filter(tags__name=t).count()
>>
>> Next I would sort indexed_tags and I have a dictionary of which tags are
>> used the most.
>>
>> I'm wondering if this is a good idea ? Since if I have 1000 tags this would
>> require 1000 queries just for one simple tag cloud.
>> Is there a better way of solving this without adding an extra count field to
>> the Tag model.
>
> Hi Jonas,
>
> your gut feeling was correct - it's not a very good idea, although
> it might work for a small site. You might want to take a look at
> database aggregation in Django:
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/topics/db/aggregation/
>
> Cheers
>
> Jirka
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
>
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Jonas Geiregat
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
