Thanks for the response, that's a completely inaccurate statement. Here's an example from the Django docs:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/topics/db/models/#intermediary-manyt omany The Group object has through="Membership". Although, one thing I notice is that it looks like in the Django example it is only using 1 ManyToMany field (e.g. the Person model does not have a manytomany field). Is that required? Only one of the related items can have a ManyToMany declared? That wouldn't make a lot of sense though, right? I would want to ask for all Restaurants a Hood as....and vice versa. I'd want all of the Hoods that belong to a Restaurant. Thanks. -Jamie -----Original Message----- From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:django-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Shawn Milochik Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:07 AM To: django-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: ManyToMany problem I don't think you can make the 'through' argument a string, and I don't think there's circular dependency issue with the 'through' kwarg. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.