You might modify the manager to store historical entries in a different table 
with the same structure. 



On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:18 AM, Mike Dewhirst <mi...@dewhirst.com.au> wrote:

> On 16/01/2012 5:19pm, Bill Beal wrote:
>> Why not have a child model that differs from the one-to-one child model
>> in that the parent key is now a foreign key to the parent?  When another
>> child needs to replace the current one in the one-to-one relationship,
>> move the child to the second table where there is a many-to-one
>> relationship to the parent, then modify the one-to-one child record.  If
>> necessary, duplicate the current one-to-one record in the many-to-one
>> table.  Does this make sense?
> 
> I understand what you mean but it feels a bit yukky. Thinking about it some 
> more maybe I need a 'hidden' field which gets updated on saving based on the 
> existence of a more modern child.
> 
> Dunno.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
>> 
>> Bill Beal
>> 
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Mike Dewhirst <mi...@dewhirst.com.au
>> <mailto:mi...@dewhirst.com.au>> wrote:
>> 
>>    I need a one-to-many to behave like a one-to-one.
>> 
>>    The parent instance of my model can only ever have one current child
>>    instance of another model. Multiple child instances have to exist
>>    and be kept for the historical record.
>> 
>>    The main benefit of one-to-one relationships is that they can be
>>    mapped together (in the Admin) as an extension of the parent.
>> 
>>    In a view I suppose I can use a manager to filter the children into
>>    a pseudo-one-to-one thingy but how do I do this in the Admin?
>> 
>>    Maybe sort them into date order and only show one? Is there a better
>>    way?
>> 
>>    Thanks for any help
>> 
>>    Mike
>> 
>>    --
>>    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>    Groups "Django users" group.
>>    To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
>>    <mailto:django-users@googlegroups.com>.
>>    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>    django-users+unsubscribe@__googlegroups.com
>>    <mailto:django-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>>    For more options, visit this group at
>>    http://groups.google.com/__group/django-users?hl=en
>>    <http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en>.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Django users" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Django users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to