I meant to post this to django-developers. But I guess this might be interesting to django-users also, so not a big mistake... :)
- Anssi On Feb 4, 3:02 am, akaariai <akaar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just completed some runs comparing performance of 1.4 vs 1.3 using > Djangobench. There doesn't seem to be any repeatable significant > regressions or gains except for these two tests: > > Running 'url_resolve' benchmark ... > Min: 0.000000 -> 0.000000: incomparable (one result was zero) > Avg: 0.000092 -> 0.000142: 1.5424x slower > Significant (t=-8.211439) > Stddev: 0.00009 -> 0.00010: 1.0696x larger (N = 500) > > Running 'url_reverse' benchmark ... > Min: 0.000000 -> 0.000000: incomparable (one result was zero) > Avg: 0.000100 -> 0.000168: 1.6761x slower > Significant (t=-8.269947) > Stddev: 0.00012 -> 0.00014: 1.1812x larger (N = 500) > > I don't know if 50% slowdown in these tests are critical. Maybe worth > checking where the difference comes from. > > I also compared 1.4 vs 1.3 when USE_TZ was set to on. No regressions > there. > > So, nothing really interesting found, which I guess is good news. > > BTW are there anybody who is running these kind of tests regularly? I > mean is there any point of reporting these kind of finds, or are they > already known? > > - Anssi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
